October 25, 2023
After the release of the 2022 Tetra Pak Sustainability Report, Lisa Ryden, VP of Corporate Social Responsibility, sat down with two of our employees - Alice Ahlinder, Junior Supply Manager and Gustav Sundström, Associate Product Manager, from our Future Talents Programme – to talk about some of their favourite highlights and areas for improvement.
Lisa is responsible for Tetra Pak’s social sustainability efforts, and she also oversees ESG reporting, including the content for the Tetra Pak Group sustainability report. The discussion between the three also presented the perfect opportunity to see how future sustainability reports could be further developed and improved.
Gustav Sundström - Associate Product Manager, Lisa Ryden - VP of Corporate Social Responsibility and Alice Ahlinder - Junior Supply Manager
“The first thing I reflected on is that this report shows a more holistic approach to sustainability. I think it’s important to get a complete picture of our efforts, and it speaks to the many ways we can have an impact,” says Gustav. Lisa adds:
“I’m glad you noticed that because it’s a big change. The report used to be a list of achievements, but we’ve been working a lot on adding a structured framework and context to each of the topics we cover in the report – and the role of Tetra Pak. Climate and recycling of packaging are topics we have been working on for a long time, but water, biodiversity and human rights are examples of topics we’ve only recently introduced in a structured way.”
To Alice, who works with supply management, it’s also clear how interconnected the sustainability areas are and how they are considered together in most parts of Tetra Pak’s business.
“It’s important that we don’t foster a silo mentality because the sustainability issues in the world are interconnected, and the solutions also need to consider this interconnectedness,” says Lisa.
The holistic approach has become a crucial part of sustainability reporting, especially with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) which are intended to boost the quality, transparency and comparability of corporate sustainability reporting. But as Lisa explains, it’s challenging and takes time to implement properly.
“It requires us to have a consistent approach across ESG topics in how we define strategies, actions, KPIs and targets. It’s true that we’re more mature in some areas like climate – which is great. But the challenge is now for all of us to broaden our understanding of sustainability and manage our impacts, risks and opportunities across many topics,” says Lisa.
“It’s great that we’re sharing progress and targets in sustainability areas where we’re maybe not as mature yet as a company. It’s brave as it allows others to challenge us. I think it’s essential to be transparent and have a growth mindset so we can get feedback, learn and continuously improve,” says Alice. And Gustav agrees:
“That’s so true. Companies may hesitate to set targets as they risk facing criticism if those targets are not reached. But you have to aim high and put yourself out there to learn – and to inspire others.”
One of the areas that Gustav is most interested in is social sustainability.
“It’s exciting because it’s charting the impact on people across our value chain. We’re looking at everything from the impact of the extraction of raw materials for our base materials to the working conditions of waste collectors,” says Lisa.
And an essential part here is local context.
“The risks to people and violation of human rights vary a lot in different parts of the world and different industries, and we need context-specific responses. Another key element is prioritisation, as it’s impossible to work on all issues everywhere. We take a risk-based approach and use standardised criteria based on the severity of impacts to define our priority issues,” says Lisa.
As talk turns to areas for improvement, Alice zooms in on women in senior positions where Tetra Pak this year reached 22%.
“That percentage is not very impressive. Especially through the eyes of my generation, we expect to see more women in senior positions. But maybe compared to the average in the industry, that number is encouraging. So It would be good to add statistics for comparison in the report,” says Alice.
Gustav agrees with Alice’s point on gender equality. He also notes how percentages are preferable to large figures when reporting on sustainability.
“Sustainability reports show many numbers, but it can sometimes be difficult to know what they mean. I would like even more context. 84% renewable energy consumption in our operations is easy to understand, but I might not grasp the level of impact of 131 kilo tonnes of CO2 saved by using more plant-based plastic. Comparative figures could also be beneficial to include,” he says.
“I’m happy that we increased our percentage of women in senior positions this year, and I hope we’ll see that trajectory continue in the next report,” says Lisa. “The comparisons are also an interesting idea that we’ll be looking into,” says Lisa and concludes:
“It’s a journey. In some areas, we’ve come a long way; in others, we certainly have more to do. Alice and Gustav – thank you both so much for sharing your thoughts on the latest sustainability report. It’s so important that we get all of our employees engaged in our work so we can keep pushing forward together.”